By Steven L.
Hayes, Director
The
Encarta Dictionary defines confidential as "private
and secret; carried out or revealed in the
expectation that anything done or revealed will be
kept private," or "dealing with private
affairs-entrusted with somebody's personal or
private matters."
It has
long been recognized by society that certain
communications will not be made unless they are
understood to be confidential. Common
examples of confidential communications that are
protected from disclosure are communications
between an individual and his minister or between
an individual and her attorney.
Most
of us know that, except in extremely rare cases,
disclosures to attorneys and ministers cannot be
voluntarily revealed by the attorney or minister
nor can they be forced to reveal the
communications by the court.
Many people
who have a substance abuse problem are not willing
to get help unless they can be certain that their
treatment is confidential. This
problem was first addressed by Congress when it
enacted
42 C.F.R. Part 2 ("Part
2").
Part 2
prohibits substance abuse treatment programs,
including medical detox facilities, from the
unauthorized disclosure
of any information that
identifies their patients as substance abusers or
as a patient in a substance abuse program--
including any verification of information that may
be already known to the person
asking.
In December,
2000, the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) issued the "Standards for Privacy of
Individually Identifiable Health Information"
final rule, pursuant to the Administrative
Simplification provisions of the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA), 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164, Subparts A and
E which applies to substance abuse
treatment programs-including medical detox
programs.
HIPAA adds even more
privacy protection by preventing unauthorized
disclosure of all
protected health information
("PHI"). PHI
is defined as anything that relates
to:
·
the past, present, or
future physical or mental health or condition of
an individual;
·
the provision of health
care to an individual;
·
the past, present, or
future payment for the provision of health care to
an individual.
While Part 2 applies only
to substance abuse programs, HIPAA applies to
almost all of the health care industry and to
employers, insurance companies and even
schools.
Part 2
and HIPAA don't just apply to employees of the
facility but to anyone that gains access to the
information-volunteers, outside vendors and
others.
Further, both require the information about
a patient to be kept confidential
forever.
Finally, the prohibition on
disclosure not only applies to patients of
facilities but also to people who applied for
admission but were never patients and to deceased
patients.
WHAT IS A DISCLOSURE UNDER
HIPAA AND PART 2?
A disclosure occurs when
information is disclosed or revealed, no matter
how it is communicated - whether in writing,
orally, electronically, or otherwise.
This prohibition on
disclosure is very
extensive and sometimes seems contrary to common
sense.
For example, if a father brings his son to
a facility and then later that day calls the
facility to ask how the son is doing, unless the
son has signed a specific consent allowing the
facility to speak with the father, the facility
cannot tell the father that the son is there or
any details about his
treatment.
The prohibition applies
even if a person is ordered to substance abuse
treatment by a court. Unless the
patient signs a consent for the court to know
their presence or treatment, the facility cannot
respond to a request from the court for the status
of a patient and cannot even confirm that the
patient is at the
facility.
Even subpoenas and arrest
or search warrants are only enforceable if they
meet the special requirements of Part 2.
WHEN ARE DISCLOSURES
AUTHORIZED?
Disclosures are permissible
if the patient has signed a consent form that
meets the requirements of Part 2 and of
HIPAA.
A valid consent form must
be in writing and will contain the
following:
·
Facility name and the name
of the recipient of
disclosure;
·
Patient name and purpose of
the disclosure;
·
Description of the
information to be disclosed and a statement of the
patient's right to revoke the consent at any
time;
·
If the program can
condition treatment on the patient signing the
consent;
·
The date or reason when the
consent expires if not revoked
earlier;
·
Signature of patient and
date signed by the
patient.
If a
facility has a valid consent form signed by the
patient, information about the patient can be
disclosed to the person authorized in the consent
form and to the extent authorized in the consent
form. For example, a
patient may sign a consent form authorizing a
medical detox facility to speak with his mother
and answer any questions that she has about his
presence at the facility, the treatment that he is
receiving and his progress. In
this event, when the mother calls, the facility
may tell the mother that her son had a tough night
but is doing better and the facility expects him
to be tapered off all drugs by a certain
date.
However, assume the patient
signed another consent form authorizing the
facility to only tell his father that he was at
the facility but to provide him no other
information.
If the father called and asked how his son
was doing, the facility would only be able to say
that the son was at the facility. If the son
did not sign a consent for the facility to speak
with the father, the facility could not even
confirm or deny that the son was at the facility
if the father
called.
Sometimes a facility can
respond to a patient's request and violate Part 2
and/or HIPAA. For
example, a patient may ask the nurse to have the
facility's finance office contact their insurance
company to determine if the patient's insurance
will cover the patient's stay. Because
the patient's consent must be in writing to be
effective, if the facility did not have a signed
consent form but contacted the patient's insurance
company and asked about any benefits available,
the facility will have violated Part 2 and
HIPAA.
Even if a former patient
calls from a police station and desperately asks
the facility to fax a record of their attendance
to the police department, the facility is not able
to comply with the request until they receive a
signed consent from the former
patient.
ARE ANY UNAUTHORIZED
DISCLOSURES
PERMITTED?
There are some disclosures
that can be made without the patient's
consent.
Both Part 2 and HIPAA permit certain
limited disclosures to law enforcement
officers.
Part 2 allows disclosures directly related
to crimes and threats to commit crimes on program
premises or against program personnel and must be
limited to the circumstances of the incident and
the patient's status, name, address and last known
whereabouts.
HIPAA permits
disclosures to law enforcement officials of PHI
that the program believes in good faith
constitutes evidence of a crime that occurred on
the program's premises. It also allows any program
staff member who was the victim of a crime to
report certain information to law enforcement
officials.
Both HIPAA and Part 2 allow
facilities to comply with state laws relating to
reporting evidence of child abuse. If a
patient tells a staff member that she feels bad
because she has been leaving her infant son alone
for hours at a time and the state law requires the
facility to report this, then the facility must
report this to the appropriate state agency even
if the patient objects.
Another type of disclosure
that is permitted about the patient is if
emergency medical services are needed. For
example, if the patient has to be taken to a
medical facility it is permissible for the
facility to disclose any information about the
patient and the patient's treatment that is
reasonably necessary for the treatment of the
patient.
Another permitted
disclosure is when facility staff need to
communicate with each other about the patient when
performing their duties. This type
of disclosure is only allowed if it is necessary
to perform a staff member's duties. It is not
permissible to make a disclosure to the cleaning
staff that the patient was using heroin before the
patient was admitted.
WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR
VIOLATING PART 2 OR
HIPAA?
Violators of confidentiality rules under
HIPAA and Part 2 are subject to civil penalties
from $100 per violation up to $25,000, and
criminal penalties up to $250,000 and 10 years in
prison for intentional
disclosure.
However, if a patient's
confidentiality rights are violated under HIPAA,
they cannot bring a suit against the violator but
must file a complaint with the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services ("HHS"). If a
patient's confidentiality rights under Part 2 were
violated, again they cannot bring suit but must
file a complaint with the U.S. Attorney's
office.
Any civil or criminal
prosecution of a violator can only be done by the
HHS or the U.S. Attorney's
office.
CONCLUSION
While they may seem
cumbersome at times, Part 2 and HIPAA have
effectively created a wall that protects the
confidentiality of patients at substance abuse
facilities.